G2 rating, 407 reviews, as pulled July 2026. Trustpilot tells a different story: 1.5 / 5 from 49 reviews, almost all about billing.
The facts founders ask about first, pulled from Crunchbase's own site and kept fair. Data accurate as of July 2026.
| Model | Private-market research database, relaunched around AI predictions; built for investors and sales teams more than founders |
| Data | 4M+ companies, funding rounds, and heat and growth signals; investor contact info is sparse |
| Geography | Global, strongest on US companies and larger rounds |
| Fundraising fit | Research only: no outreach, no warm intros, and exports capped at 2,000 rows per month on Pro |
| Pricing | Free tier; Pro $49/mo billed annually or $99 month-to-month; Business $199/mo billed annually; 7-day auto-converting trial |
| Best for | Researching which investors are active in your space before you start outreach |
| Not ideal for | Contacting investors, or anyone wary of auto-renewing annual billing |
Crunchbase's score depends entirely on where you look. The people reviewing the product on G2 and Capterra rate it highly; the people venting on Trustpilot are almost all there about billing. That split is the whole story, so here is each platform, checked in July 2026.
Ratings shown as reported by each platform, pulled July 2026. Displayed for information only; we do not collect or host reviews of Crunchbase.
We read through the real threads in r/startups, r/venturecapital and r/techsales so you do not have to. Each theme below is paraphrased in our own words and links to its source thread. The billing complaints live mostly on Trustpilot rather than Reddit.
When founders ask where investor and funding data actually lives, Crunchbase is the name that comes up first, paywall and all. It is the reference point everyone else is compared against.
Source thread: r/startups, February 2025A sales user describes living in Crunchbase to catch newly funded companies and closing real revenue off that signal. The who-just-raised data is the part people rate most highly.
Source thread: r/techsales, May 2025Angel-community organizers list a Crunchbase profile among the places investors check, so founders benefit from keeping even a free profile current and accurate.
Source thread: r/AngelInvesting, January 2025It tracks what already happened. Users conclude it is not a deal-finding tool for an active raise: it tells you who raised last quarter, not who to email this week.
Source thread: r/startups, January 2024A VC-community user found search results worse than a quick manual search when hunting for smaller investors, and reviewers on three platforms echo staleness outside the big US rounds.
Source thread: r/venturecapital, March 2024Per-seat costs push users to hunt for open alternatives once they lose a company subscription, and API pricing is described as opaque and sales-gated.
Source thread: r/venturecapital, 2024Editorial summary of public Reddit threads, verified July 2026. The billing complaints that dominate Crunchbase's Trustpilot page are covered in the ratings section above.
Both lists are drawn from the reviews and founder sentiment above and Crunchbase's own published information, not from marketing copy.
Crunchbase tells you who raised last quarter. Angels Partners tells you who to talk to now and then does the talking: 120,000+ contactable investors, sequences from your own inbox, automatic follow-ups and an AI CRM that tracks every reply. See how that works in the investor database, or read the full Crunchbase vs Angels Partners comparison.
You want one place to find investors, email them from your own inbox, and keep every conversation straight, with the option to hand the whole raise to a team if you would rather not run it yourself.

You mainly need market research, funding history and activity signals to understand your space before you start a raise, and you will handle outreach with other tools.
Yes. Founded in 2007, independent since 2015 and one of the most used private-market databases, Crunchbase is rated 4.4/5 across 407 G2 reviews. Its Trustpilot score is 1.5/5 though, driven almost entirely by complaints about auto-renewing billing and trial conversions, so read the cancellation terms before subscribing.
There is a free tier. Pro costs $49 per user per month billed annually, or $99 month-to-month, and Business is $199 per month billed annually, as of July 2026. The 7-day trial auto-converts and refunds are voided if you export data. Angels Partners has a free tier too: browse the investor database, no credit card.
Reviewers praise the breadth of funding data, filters and signals. The recurring criticisms are stale data below the big US rounds, sparse contact information and billing practices, which dominate its Trustpilot page.
For actually reaching investors rather than researching them, Angels Partners pairs a 120,000+ investor database with inbox-based sequences, automatic follow-ups and an AI fundraising CRM. See the full Crunchbase vs Angels Partners comparison.
A research database tells you who exists. Angels Partners finds the right investors, emails them from your own inbox and tracks every reply, so your research turns into meetings.
Try it free: browse the investor database, no credit card.







