Trustpilot rating for the UK site, 249 reviews, as pulled July 2026. The profile now trades under AIN's sister brand SeedTribe. It is the only large review sample the platform has.
The facts founders ask about first, pulled from AIN's own site and kept fair. Data accurate as of July 2026.
| Model | Pitch marketplace: founders post a pitch and pay for visibility to a network of angel investors |
| Network size | 150,000+ investor members and 600,000+ registered entrepreneurs across 40 networks in 90 countries, per AIN |
| Geography | Global network of country sites, headquartered in London |
| Funding stages | Early-stage startups seeking angel investment |
| Pricing | Free 30-day listing, then pay-to-pitch packages from around £149 for 90 days up to about £2,499 for the most visible tiers |
| Best for | Founders who want a wide public pitch listing and are comfortable paying upfront for exposure |
| Not ideal for | Founders who want vetted, engaged investor interest rather than paid exposure, or who dislike per-pitch fees |
AIN's review footprint is concentrated on Trustpilot, where the UK site has a large but low-scoring sample. Here is exactly what exists, checked in July 2026.
Ratings shown as reported by Trustpilot, pulled July 2026. Displayed for information only; we do not collect or host reviews of Angel Investment Network.
AIN's 249 Trustpilot reviews are unusually polarized, so both sides are worth reading before you pay. Each theme below is paraphrased in our own words and links to the public Trustpilot profile.
The five-star reviews come from founders who closed funding through the platform, describing high-quality angels and a real return on the fee they paid. When it works, it clearly works.
Source: Trustpilot reviews, July 2026Positive reviewers mention the team helping shape their proposition and then introducing them to a batch of ten to fifteen angels, some of which converted into investment.
Source: Trustpilot reviews, July 2026Supporters praise how simple it is to get a pitch in front of a large, international pool of investors that would otherwise be hard to reach as a first-time founder.
Source: Trustpilot reviews, July 2026The most common one-star theme: founders paid for a pitch package, received little genuine investor engagement, and concluded the money was wasted. This drives the 2 score.
Source: Trustpilot reviews, July 2026Several reviewers say the refund terms are worded so they are difficult to actually claim, leaving them out of pocket after a disappointing pitch run.
Source: Trustpilot reviews, July 2026Critical reviewers question how vetted the investor side is, reporting contacts that did not match their stage or sector, or that never intended to invest.
Source: Trustpilot reviews, July 2026Editorial summary of AIN's public Trustpilot reviews, verified July 2026. With a 2/5 average across 249 reviews, the critical themes outweigh the positive ones.
Both lists are drawn from the Trustpilot sentiment above and AIN's own published information, not from marketing copy.
AIN asks you to pay for a pitch and then wait to be noticed. Angels Partners flips that around: you reach investors directly, sequences go out from your own inbox with automatic follow-ups, and there is no per-pitch fee gating your exposure. See how that works in the investor database, or read the full Angel Investment Network vs Angels Partners comparison.
You want to reach investors directly rather than pay for a listing and hope, with the option to hand the whole raise to a team if you would rather not run it yourself.

You want the widest possible public pitch listing, you understand it is pay-to-pitch, and you are comfortable paying upfront for exposure with no guarantee of interest.
Yes. Angel Investment Network is a real, long-running platform founded in 2004 by Mike Lebus and James Badgett in London, with over 150,000 investor members across 40 country networks. It is a genuine service, but its Trustpilot rating is a low 2/5 across 249 reviews, with founders split between those who raised and those who paid to pitch and saw no result, so weigh both sides before you pay.
Listing an idea is free for 30 days, then paid pitch packages run from about 149 pounds for 90 days up to around 2,499 pounds for the most visible tiers, as of July 2026. It is a pay-to-pitch model: you pay to be seen, not on success. Angels Partners has a free tier instead: browse the investor database, no credit card.
Reviews are highly polarized. Some founders report raising capital and getting introductions to 10 to 15 angels; many others say they paid, got little genuine investor interest, and found the refund terms hard to use. That divide is why its Trustpilot score sits at 2/5.
For founders who would rather reach investors directly than pay to post a pitch and wait, Angels Partners pairs a 120,000+ investor database with inbox-based sequences, automatic follow-ups and an AI fundraising CRM, with no per-pitch fee. See the full Angel Investment Network vs Angels Partners comparison.
Instead of paying to post a pitch and waiting, Angels Partners finds the right investors, emails them from your own inbox and tracks every reply, so your effort turns into meetings.
Try it free: browse the investor database, no credit card.







